A year ago I delved headfirst into the women's liberation movement that erupted in the 1960s and 1970s and discovered a newfound love and appreciation for Gloria Steinem (A Debt of Gratitude). It only took me a year (and many years before that), but I've finally read arguably the book of the women's movement, Betty Friedan's classic groundbreaker, The Feminine Mystique.
The Feminine Mystique isn't only for desperate housewives (or the
modern-day equivalent), though it was at least partially intended to wake them from their often self-induced comas. It's for all women because we've all
been affected by the mystique in some way. The overriding theme that
comes out of Friedan's research is that women need to find themselves
outside of their homes, husbands, and children (if they have them) to
be happy, healthy, and complete. If a woman is secure in her identity, has a creative outlet, and has a meaningful, challenging career,
then she's capable of being a better wife and mother regardless of
whether she completes 10 hours of housework a day.
What shocked me when reading the book is its relevance 50 years after it was first published. I know I can relate, as the daughter and granddaughter of housewives, to the information that Friedan's research uncovered. I know women (like my mom) who feel bored, stifled, and creatively blocked as stay-at-home moms. And I know adult women who are so desperate to avoid the fate of their frustrated housewife moms that they rebel against marriage and children altogether. (Let's just say those passages hit close to home for this blogger.)
I also know men and women who have been psychologically damaged from being raised by clingy moms who never developed their own interests and lived only through their children and husbands. I know that this problem is still alive and well. As a college student 10 years ago, I heard stories similar to the ones Friedan details in her text of at least one male professor who encouraged female students to switch from pre-law studies to teaching or nursing, careers supposedly better suited to women.
So the damage caused by decades of "the problem that has no name" is
ongoing. The difference between now and then, I hope, is that we're more aware of it today (thanks in part to this book) and have more
opportunities to build lives outside our homes to resist its insidious
effects. We need that awareness to prevent more women from losing
themselves, their identities, and their full potential as humans to it.
 |
| Betty Friedan: another woman to admire and appreciate. |
I'm not a wife or mother, and I'm thankful I'm not because I know that in many ways I've just begun to do the hard work of figuring out who I am, what I want, and what my life's purpose is. Friedan postulates that many women hide behind marriage, motherhood, and low-skilled jobs to avoid doing the painful, uncomfortable task of fleshing out their identities and discovering their full potential. (I admittedly felt challenged reading the chapter that discusses this. Maybe I'm guilty of taking a less challenging job that I'm capable of performing and selling myself and my abilities short in the process. It's an uncomfortable thought provoked by the book's content, though that goes to show how important Friedan's words were and are.)
Near the end of the book, she writes,
"It is easier to live through someone else than to become complete yourself. The freedom to lead and plan your own life is frightening if you have never faced it before. It's frightening when a woman finally realizes that there is no answer to the question 'who am I' except the voice inside herself."
The search for identity is as necessary today to a woman's emotional well-being as it was 50 years ago. After all, what good are the strides made by 1960s feminists if they aren't carried out and expanded today? We have a responsibility to ourselves and the generations to come to continue their work.